<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Math Goes Pop! &#187; gender gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathgoespop.com/tag/gender-gap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathgoespop.com</link>
	<description>Ruminations on the Intersection Between Mathematics and Popular Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:49:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Female Math Role Models?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathgoespop.com/2011/03/female-math-role-models.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathgoespop.com/2011/03/female-math-role-models.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Math in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women and Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danica mckellar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathgoespop.com/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve occasionally touched upon the gender gap in mathematics, mostly in response to some recent study that has attempted to explain why mathematics (and the sciences in general) are so predominately male.  An article that appeared in Slate last week makes me think it is time, once again, to discuss this topic.</p>
<p>After giving a brief overview <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.mathgoespop.com/2011/03/female-math-role-models.html">Female Math Role Models?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve occasionally touched upon the <a href="http://www.mathgoespop.com/category/women-and-math">gender gap</a> in mathematics, mostly in response to some recent study that has attempted to explain why mathematics (and the sciences in general) are so predominately male.  An <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2286671/">article</a> that appeared in Slate last week makes me think it is time, once again, to discuss this topic.</p>
<p>After giving a brief overview of the observed gender gap in science and math careers, writer Shankar Vedantam then discusses the results of some recent experiments out of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst which revealed new features of this gender gap.</p>
<p>In both experiments, researchers (roughly speaking) found correlations between the unconscious attitudes that females in a variety of scientific majors had towards mathematics and the gender of proctors and professors in mathematics.  Among the findings (more details can be had by viewing the article):</p>
<ul>
<li>Given a question posed to the classroom by the professor, the percentage of female respondents decreased from 11% at the beginning of the semester to 7% at the end when the professor was male, but jumped from 7% to 46% when the professor was female.</li>
<li>The percentage of female students who asked for help from the professor went from 12% to 14% when the professor was female, but dropped from 12% to 0% when the professor was male.</li>
<li>Female students wound up with less mathematical confidence when their professors were male, even if they performed better than their male peers when tested on their math performance.</li>
</ul>
<p>These statistics are quite interesting, although it would be helpful if they were a bit more contextualized.  For example, how did the percentage of male students who asked for help from the professor vary with the professor&#8217;s gender?  Certainly a drop from 12% to 0% is telling, but if, for instance, a professor can&#8217;t retain even one female in his office hours by the end of the semester, that may say more about his teaching abilities in general than it does about any unconscious bias at work.</p>
<p>Even so, this correlation between female performance/self-identification and the presence of a female mentor is an intriguing one.  While I don&#8217;t necessarily think that one can draw a causal inference from the data, it certainly would be nice if female students who are interested in mathematics had a larger pool of female role models from which to draw.  Restricted to the realm of popular culture, the number of mathematically-inclined female role models is particularly slim.  The only one I can think of offhand is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danica_McKellar">Danica McKellar</a>, who, though well-intentioned, still conforms to gender stereotypes that many parents may find problematic.</p>
<p>For my own part, I&#8217;m proud to say that I&#8217;m fairly good at retaining students in office hours from week to week.  It may not be much, but maybe it&#8217;s a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathgoespop.com/2011/03/female-math-role-models.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gender Gap Genesis</title>
		<link>http://www.mathgoespop.com/2010/02/gender-gap-genesis.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathgoespop.com/2010/02/gender-gap-genesis.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Math Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women and Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathgoespop.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Late last year, a study was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which tried to pin down origins for the gender gap in mathematics education.  As I&#8217;ve discussed before, the gender gap in math education is shrinking, and has been shown to be less about biology and more about culture &#8211; in cultures <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.mathgoespop.com/2010/02/gender-gap-genesis.html">Gender Gap Genesis</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Late last year, a study was published in <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> which tried to pin down origins for the gender gap in mathematics education.  As I&#8217;ve discussed <a href="http://www.mathgoespop.com/2008/07/math-in-the-news-the-gender-gap-is-closed-for-business.html">before</a>, the gender gap in math education is shrinking, and has been shown to be less about biology and more about culture &#8211; in cultures where gender equality is weaker, the gender gap is stronger.  Nevertheless, even in American culture, the gender gap still persists, and this study by Sian Beilock and others has tried to figure out how, if the gender gap is culturally based, it comes about in young students.  The original study can be found <a href="http://hpl.uchicago.edu/Publications/Publications1.html">here</a>, while a discussion of the study that was featured in the news can be found <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_sci_fear_of_figures">here</a>.</p>
<p>Professor Beilock and her colleagues tried to correlate young students&#8217; math anxiety with the math anxiety of their teachers.  In particular, they looked at 1st and 2nd grade students, of whom a vast majority (over 90%) have teachers who are female.  The study assessed the math anxiety of the teachers and measured the math achievement of the students at the beginning and end of the year.  Here are the results, taken from the introduction to the paper:</p>
<blockquote><p>There was no relation between a teacher’s math anxiety and her students’ math achievement at the beginning of the school year. By the school year’s end, however, the more anxious teachers were about math, the more likely girls (but not boys) were to endorse the commonly held stereotype that “boys are good at math, and girls are good at reading” and the lower these girls’ math achievement. Indeed, by the end of the school year, girls who endorsed this stereotype had significantly worse math achievement than girls who did not and than boys overall.</p></blockquote>
<p>These findings make intuitive sense, and lend further support for the need to better our mathematics education at all levels, or at the very least require primary educators to study mathematics more seriously.  Teaching mathematics with confidence is not something that comes automatically, even for those who may have been good at math in their early years.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that boys weren&#8217;t more likely to endorse the view that boys are good at math and girls are good at reading if their teacher had math anxiety.  I&#8217;d be curious to see what the case is in a classroom led by a male teacher, both with and without math anxiety.  Given the dearth of male primary educators, however, this type of data may be harder to acquire.  In any event, the lesson here is clear: if you want your daughter to not fear math, it wouldn&#8217;t hurt to demand that her teachers not fear it either.  Or at the very least, demand that any math fear be exhibited only by male teachers.  That may be a cheaper solution.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be interested in knowing whether this trend can be reversed by a suitably competent teacher.  If a group of 2nd grade girls is taught math by a woman who is unqualified, but in 6th grade is taught by a woman who is exceptional, can this help undo the damage that the 2nd grade teacher has done?  I would hope so.</p>
<div id="attachment_192" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 296px"><a href="http://www.mathgoespop.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/prezbo.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-192" title="prezbo" src="http://www.mathgoespop.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/prezbo.jpg" alt="" width="286" height="362" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#39;s too bad Prezbo doesn&#39;t have lady parts.</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathgoespop.com/2010/02/gender-gap-genesis.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

